Not quite yet lawmakers to the world: to sighs of relief from the business community, the Supreme Court last week ruled 8-0 that federal antitrust law cannot be used to demand triple damages from foreign businesses over sins committed abroad against foreign consumers absent some more substantial domestic involvement in the case. It overturned the D.C Circuit's ruling to the contrary. "Stephen A. Bokat, senior vice president and general counsel of the United States Chamber of Commerce, said the decision was a 'very positive development' in its campaign against what it calls 'global forum shopping.'" (Linda Greenhouse, "The Reach of U.S. Antitrust Law Overseas Is Limited", New York Times, Jun. 15).
SCOTUS: antitrust law not readily exportable
- Madison County's controversial asbestos litigation system under fire yet again
- Preempro jackpot justice verdicts in Philadelphia
- "Something intrinsically unusual is occurring in Philadelphia"
- More on the Eastern District of Texas
- "Patent company has big case, no office"
- Why is the Eastern District of Texas home to so many patent trolls?
- Around the web, July 27
- Insurers and Toyota sudden acceleration
- $322M verdict for phantom asbestosis
- The need for federal anti-SLAPP law
- CBS and Brian Cole's $131 million verdict against Ford
- Madison County asbestos
- Around the web, August 4
- Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, Inc.
- State discrimination law vs. its federal counterpart
Center for Legal Policy at the