PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Kinsley on Ernst v. Merck | Toad in the hole »

August 29, 2005


"Fees of the assumption"

David Giacalone also has his differences with the Tabarrok/Helland "Two Cheers for Contingent Fees" paper (see Aug. 24, Aug. 25). More: the ABA Journal eReport covers the controversy, provoking another post from David.

Posted by Walter Olson at 07:59 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Attorneys' Fees and Ethics









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.