PointofLaw.com

spacer FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Well, that's one possibility | Constitutional Model for Questioning Judicial Nominees IV »

July 30, 2005


Constitutional Model for Questioning Judicial Nominees - A Response

In the spirit of a lively debate, I must admit that I'm as confused by Ted Frank's reply to my earlier post, as he says he is by my post.

Of course the Constitution does not prohibit the Gang of Seven from publishing their AskJohnRoberts website. I never meant to suggest that it did.

My point, on which I'm sure Ted will agree, is that this "meaningless publicity stunt" is unprecedented and inconsistent with the intent of the drafters of the Constitution. I've prepared a more fullsome reply here.

Posted by Jonathan B. Wilson at 08:45 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Judiciary









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.