class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« Corporate governance & responsibility | Taylor on Bush reforms »

January 31, 2005


Supremes: contingent fees taxable

The Supreme Court ruled last week that contingent fees are taxable to the client, even if they pass through directly to the attorney. Calling the position of a client and his attorney the "quintessential principal-agent relationship," Justice Kennedy wrote for a unanimous court in determining that "as a general rule, when a litigant's recovery constitutes income, the litigant's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee." The Association of Trial Lawyers of America and various public interest firms were displeased with the decision. (See full text of decision here.)

Posted by James R. Copland at 08:49 PM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Attorneys' Fees and Ethics









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.