class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« MTBE's cash leak | Update: British Medical Journal embarrassed »

January 28, 2005


Mississippi burning

As if to prove Alex Tabarrok's point about the unseemliness of judicial elections, a kerfuffle has arisen in Mississippi, where a plaintiff made the mistake of filing a brief accusing a justice of actual impropriety, rather than just the appearance of impropriety, through campaign donations. The recusal motion, filed after the appeal was decided, was denied as late (one is not allowed to play heads I win, tails requires a do-over), and the attorney was sanctioned. (Siobhan Morrissey, "Motion Moves Judge To Impose Sanctions", ABA Journal eReport, Jan. 28).

Posted by Ted Frank at 05:21 PM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Judiciary









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.