class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« Tabarrok, Surowiecki on Vioxx | MTBE's cash leak »

January 28, 2005

Doctors' discipline and lawyers' gamesmanship

As part of the general national debate over medical negligence, there is movement in many states to toughen up disciplinary action against doctors, as by mandating that existing disciplinary boards conduct automatic investigations of doctors accused of certain kinds of misconduct. Might such measures afford new leverage to malpractice lawyers suing those doctors? Well, yes, they might, according to three attorneys discussing a new Pennsylvania law:

Because even a single act of negligence can now trigger an investigation of a board and the commencement of a disciplinary proceeding, astute malpractice defense counsel anticipate that initial malpractice complaints will be drafted with "triggering" events prominently alleged.

Posted by Walter Olson at 01:54 AM | TrackBack (0)

Medicine and Law



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.