class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« Bush's inaugural address this week | British Medical Journal embarrassed »

January 18, 2005


Wall Street research lawsuits

They're not going well for plaintiffs, reports the WSJ (sub-$). After the 2003 settlement in which 10 Wall Street firms agreed to pay $1.4 billion in fines and restitution over charges of having improperly tilted their stock research to favor underwriting clients, class action lawyers "spen[t] millions of dollars on television and newspaper ads in search of people who lost money on WorldCom and other stocks mentioned in the settlement." But "[s]ecurities-industry arbitration panels have rejected the vast majority of cases decided so far." "'We bet big, and so far we have lost big,' says Richard Lott, an attorney with Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Echsner & Proctor, a large class-action firm in Pensacola, Fla. Most of the arbitration cases stemming from the stock-research settlement have been filed by Mr. Lott's firm and another pair of lawyers, James Hooper and Robert Weiss, who are based in Orlando and Jericho, N.Y., respectively."

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:29 AM | TrackBack (1)



categories:
Class Actions









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.