class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« New Tillinghast study | New Jersey doctor shortage »

January 10, 2005


Featured Discussion underway now

As I indicated before the holidays, we are fortunate to have two outstanding legal thinkers kick off our year with a discussion of judicial election and selection systems. Following the excesses of the past year's judicial elections, are we better off with an appointment system, whether or not akin to the federal model? Are electoral systems -- which are unlikely to go away in the many states where they exist -- capable of producing good judges?

Helping us answer these questions are Alex Tabarrok and David Rottman. Alex is a professor of economics at George Mason; many of you may know him from the weblog Marginal Revolution, which he runs with Tyler Cowen. Along with Claremont McKenna's Eric Helland, Alex authored "The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Tort Awards," which examined whether partisan elected judges redistributed wealth from out-of-state defendants to in-state plaintiffs.

David is Principal Court Research Consultant at the National Center for State Courts. For almost 20 years, he has examined American courts. In 2000, the NCSC issued an exhaustive study, "Call to Action: Statement of the National Summit On Improving Judicial Selection" (PDF). The study includes both comprehensive data on varying election/selection systems around the nation as well as 20 proposals for reform.

Our discussion kicks off this week (here). We hope you'll find it interesting!

Posted by James R. Copland at 01:42 PM | TrackBack (1)



categories:
Judiciary
Politics









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.