class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« AMA wants expert reform | Regulating drugs in court »

January 04, 2005

Subsidizing docs' insurance

That's the supposed compromise just arrived at between Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich and Democratic legislators to address the state's malpractice crisis, but Point of Law contributor Michael Krauss, writing in the Baltimore Sun, warns that it's the wrong path (see also Dec. 14). More: a WSJ ($) editorial updates the situation. After the initial offer of a compromise by Gov. Ehrlich, Democrats in the Maryland legislature rejected the liability curbs but took and ran with the idea of subsidizing doctors' malpractice coverage, drawing up plans for a steep new tax on HMOs toward that purpose, and defying the governor's threatened veto of the idea.

Posted by Walter Olson at 10:30 PM | TrackBack (0)

Medicine and Law



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.