class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

FORUM

« Yale Daily News on litigation reform | Colo. could restore "open and obvious danger" rule »

February 22, 2005


Poultry in motion

From a mini-profile ("Fringe Player: The Case Broker" by Jonathan Moxey) in The American Lawyer's 2004 supplement Plaintiff Power (this portion not online, purchase):

An East Texas lawyer once told Robert Steinberg that there are two kinds of civil litigators: chicken catchers and chicken pluckers. Steinberg is a chicken catcher.

Outside of East Texas, that means he's a referral lawyer. He makes his living signing up clients and then sending their cases to other lawyers -- the chicken pluckers -- to litigate. Steinberg hasn't been active in the courtroom since 2001. ...


Steinberg describes himself as a "good-looking guy who speaks well" and says he had a face-lift in January. He spends heavily on advertising -- $1.6 million in the last two years -- and says he signs up several hundred clients a year. Then he farms them out for a split of the fee.
When he meets his clients, he says, he admits up front that he won't be the lawyer handling their cases. He says that most of them don't care and that he's never been asked about how legal fees would be divided.
No word about whether he explains to them the chicken metaphor, and their role in it. More: Legal Ethics Forum (Feb. 26) has a discussion of the Texas Supreme Court's efforts to rein in the Lone Star State's unusually wide-open fee-splitting rules.

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:07 AM | TrackBack (1)



categories:
Attorneys' Fees and Ethics









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.