class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

FORUM

« Silica castle erodes suddenly | Lose an election? Sue, of course »

December 21, 2004


Posting doctors' malpractice histories

New Jersey's new practice of posting physicians' payout histories (at njdoctorlist.com) has several distinct advantages for plaintiff's lawyers -- it can help them decide whether to take cases, give them the jump on discovery, and enable them to develop arguments that defendants were on notice of problems -- but also a potentially serious disadvantage: according to the New Jersey Law Journal, scattered reports suggest that doctors are becoming more reluctant to approve settlements now that they can do so only in the public glare.

Posted by Walter Olson at 01:12 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Medicine and Law









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.