class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

FORUM

« Gulf War Syndrome: a stacked panel? | Justice Talking »

December 13, 2004


Trial lawyers qualify Wash. med-mal initiative

The ballot battles continue: trial lawyers and allies in Washington state have gathered enough signatures to qualify a ballot initiative that would (as with recently successful Florida measures) curb peer-review confidentiality and bar doctors from practice after three findings of medical negligence. It would do other things, too, including outlaw confidentiality agreements in settlements, start a supplemental insurance fund, and, so it is said, sanction lawyers who file frivolous lawsuits. Doctors have their own proposal which hasn't qualified yet (via KevinMD).

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:32 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Medicine and Law
Politics









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.