class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

FORUM

« Insurance rate suppression | P.R. by Fenton »

December 06, 2004


Why Spitzer's targets go quietly

Despite much grumbling from business quarters about the New York attorney general's adventurous enforcement initiatives, virtually all his targets elect to settle with him rather than insist on their right to trial. The major exception, former NYSE head Richard Grasso, is an individual as distinct from a publicly traded corporation -- and that distinction is probably no coincidence, according to the reasoning of this piece by Michael Bobelian of the New York Law Journal. More from the same source on the Grasso case, noting that "Spitzer faces significant legal hurdles in showing that the former stock exchange CEO and chairman violated New York's nonprofit laws".

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:36 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
NY & Region
Regulation Through Litigation









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.