class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

FORUM

« Olson on obesity | Why Spitzer's targets go quietly »

December 06, 2004


Insurance rate suppression

Baylor professor and finance blogger Jim Garven (Dec. 1) posts on the politics of insurance rate regulation, with particular attention to the factors that can give rise to "rate suppression", which arises when regulators refuse to permit market-clearing rates. Of particular interest is his footnote 3, which reads in part: "The plaintiff’s bar likes rate suppression because this process renders the insurance ratemaking process into a very opaque and largely unintelligible process which makes it all the more difficult for consumers to discern the relative magnitude of the impact that the U.S. civil justice system has upon insurance rates. The reason why consumers’ groups prefer low rates should be apparent, but an often overlooked second order effect derives from that fact that many of these groups are funded primarily by plaintiff’s attorney associations (e.g., Ralph Nader’s Public Citizen group is known to receive as much as 3/4 of its funding from plaintiff’s attorneys)."

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:06 AM | TrackBack (1)



categories:
Insurance Law









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.