class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« New Becker/Posner blog | Tax protestors in action »

November 24, 2004


Chrysler to appeal $102 million verdict

As analyzed in more detail by Ted Frank at overlawyered, a Tennessee jury has awarded over $105 million to the family of an 8-month old killed in a tragic car injury in 2001 when a pickup truck going 70 miles per hour rear-ended the Chrysler minivan containing the infant. $101.75 million of the verdict is allocated to Chrysler on the theory that the infant's death was caused when the front seat of the van collapsed backwards onto his head. But the seat backs exceeded U.S. regulatory standards by more than three times, and as Ted points out, a stiffer seat back would result in far more net deaths over the vast majority of collisions.

Such is the problem of regulation through litigation, which lacks the sophistication of industry engineers and regulatory agencies and is prone to juries' "hindsight bias," i.e., "the human tendency to overstate the predictability of past events." (For a more detailed discussion of hindsight bias, see Steve Hantler's The Seven Myths of Highly Effective Plaintiffs' Lawyers.)

Chrysler has, of course, announced that it will appeal the decision.

Posted by James R. Copland at 04:06 PM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Products Liability
Regulation Through Litigation









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.