class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« Specter and tort reform, part deux | New Hampshire medicine »

November 16, 2004

Living in the Welfare State

Thanks to this post on the Adam Smith Institute Blog, we learn of the publication of a "hard-hitting" indictment of Britain's welfare state. James Bartholomew's The Welfare State We're In has just been published by Politico's Publishing. According to the ASI Blog, Bartholomew argues that social security has produced alienation and crime, unemployment, and more poverty; that means-testing has discouraged work and saving; that the high taxes required have made work less attractive. That the [National Health Service] is "like a train crash every day." That old people would be better off if the state pension had never been created. That the UK could have been a rich country, but the postwar welfare state killed any chance of it.

Bartholomew had a column in the Telegraph last week, arguing "There was never any need for the NHS to begin with."

Posted by Michael DeBow at 04:55 PM | TrackBack (0)




Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.