class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« Emergency medicine: a gathering crisis | "Aggressive settlement policy" »

November 15, 2004


Federalist panel on reg-by-lit

I took part this weekend in a panel discussion at the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention in Washington, D.C. on the subject of regulation by litigation. My remarks inquired into the subject of why Congress isn't more jealous of its prerogatives when the "Fourth Branch" of trial lawyers exercises lawmaking ambitions in areas like tobacco, guns and health care. The question period got into federalism, among other topics. Law professor Jonathan Adler of Case Western was there and blogged the whole thing at Commons Blog (Nov. 12).

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:47 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Regulation Through Litigation









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.