class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

FORUM

« Maryland med-mal | Hantler updated; another online resource noted »

December 15, 2004


Litigating pensions into oblivion

Sue pension plans enough, and they'll go away: In September IBM agreed to a settlement of up to $1.7 billion in a widely publicized case in which lawyers representing 140,000 workers accusing its plan of discriminating against older workers. That's in no way an isolated case, reports The Deal: "Dozens of corporations are being sued for altering their pension plans, with the potential liabilities running into the hundreds-of-billions of dollars;" shifts from defined-contribution to "cash-balance" plans have been especially controversial. And so what logically happens next? Yep: IBM just announced that new hires won't be entered into pension plans as such at all in the future, but only 401(k) savings plans. Not that 401(k)s are entirely safe from a legal standpoint either, as Delta Air Lines management could tell them.... (all links courtesy Law.com). More: yet another link (from before recent IBM settlement).

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:02 AM | TrackBack (1)



categories:
Employment Law









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.