class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« s. 17200 (and Proposition 64) roundup [reprint] | Amendment 3's poll surge »

November 02, 2004


Fla. docs' outreach

There's no question Florida doctors have been working hard on behalf of their side of the initiative battle, as witness this report of a rally in Sebring. However, their outreach to natural allies seems to leave much to be desired. The publication Insurance Journal talked to several Florida independent insurance agents and found that "amazingly, even on election day, none had investigated the details or implications of this amendment to the insurance industry and very few had made up their mind about how to vote." Meanwhile, perhaps stung by criticism, trial lawyer interests are now taking pains to deny that their revenge-initiative Amendment Seven would necessarily crack open hospital peer review records.

Posted by Walter Olson at 07:25 PM | TrackBack (2)



categories:
Medicine and Law









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.