class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« Professor Brickman: Good, rare decision to question 9/11 fund fees | State AGs and the flu vaccine shortage »

October 15, 2004

Recess appointment upheld

Yesterday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to President Bush's recess appointment of William H. Pryor, Jr. to that court earlier this year. Eight judges signed on to the order in Evans v. Stephens, which concludes that "both the words of the Constitution and the history of the nation support the President's authority." One judge dissented on the merits (Judge Barkett), and one dissented on the grounds that the court should have declined to rule on the motion in order to certify it to the U.S. Supreme Court (Judge Wilson).

Posted by Michael DeBow at 12:10 AM | TrackBack (0)




Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.