class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

FORUM

« Anonymous experts: a reader writes | Malpractice reform: Maryland »

October 05, 2004


Beldar on firing contingency lawyers

The Texas trial lawyer takes a look at the case (see Sept. 29) of the client who got hit in the Second Circuit with a substantial quantum meruit award of legal fees after firing its contingency-fee lawyer without good cause, even though the case was later settled without cash payment. He concludes that the lawyer was probably within its rights to insist on the payment, and that it is important for clients to be warned going in of the possibly harsh consequences of dropping their lawyers without good cause.

Posted by Walter Olson at 09:03 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Attorneys' Fees and Ethics









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.