class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« Sarbanes-Oxley meets its match | Thanks -- and welcome! -- Michael DeBow »

October 20, 2004


Disclaimer-shredding on the slopes

Continuing a trend toward expanding liability for recreation providers, the Connecticut Supreme Court this summer made it harder for ski operators to disclaim responsibility for customers' collisions. It didn't seem to matter that a state statute sets forth a principle that skiers assume the risk of collisions. The Connecticut Law Tribune has details. For more on Connecticut recreational liability, see Overlawyered, Sept. 27, 1999.

Posted by Walter Olson at 01:29 AM | TrackBack (1)



categories:
Miscellaneous









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.