class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« Asbestos: Pfizer's Quigley bankrupt | Employers: object to a button, go to jail »

September 09, 2004


House panel OKs Rule 11 revival; Greenspan speaks

On a party-line 18-10 vote, the House Judiciary Committee gave its approval to Rep. Lamar Smith's bill reviving serious sanctions against frivolous litigation (see Aug. 17, Jun. 21); strong Rule 11 sanctions were in effect between 1983 and 1993 in federal courts but were then gutted after a determined campaign by the litigation lobby. Some Democrats said they were sympathetic to sanctions but objected to another provision of the bill curbing forum-shopping. (Reuters; Business Insurance).

Elsewhere on Capitol Hill, Reuters also reports, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan commented on the tort issue, which we don't remember his having done in the past. Greenspan "said in response to Republican questioning that excessive lawsuits were like a tax on business activity. 'It has the economic impact which is similar to a tax,' Greenspan said in the House Banking Committee when asked by Pennsylvania's Rep. Pat Toomey whether tort claims 'beyond what is appropriate and necessary' could be described as a tax."

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:04 AM | TrackBack (2)



categories:
Politics
Procedure









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.