class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« "Making Lawyers Compete" | 10 charged with fraud in $150 million fen-phen verdict »

August 31, 2004


NY Times on referral-fee case

On August 9 Ted Frank posted on the case of Illinois lawyer Joseph Dowd, who insisted on collecting a six-digit "referral fee" from Mary Corcoran although the underlying litigation had been sufficiently unsuccessful that the prominent firm of Corboy & Demetrio, which handled the case, declined to charge a fee at all. (Prof. Steven Lubet wrote the case up in American Lawyer). This weekend the New York Times's Adam Liptak filed a lengthy report on the case, with various additional details including a new wrinkle: apparently it was lawyer Dowd who first approached the widow Corcoran, at Harpoon Louie's restaurant. Mr. Dowd, whose role in the case was basically to pick up the phone and call the highly regarded Corboy firm, "is not satisfied with the $140,000 the court awarded him. He has filed a new suit for the interest that sum would have earned had he received it sooner."

Posted by Walter Olson at 03:06 PM | TrackBack (1)



categories:
Attorneys' Fees and Ethics









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.