class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« Texas reforms reduce malpractice costs | From the archives: benefits of product liability »

August 26, 2004

"Bad ideas don't travel"

In yesterday's Wall Street Journal (sub - $), historian John Steele Gordon observes that two of the salient features of the American litigation system -- the rule that each side bears its own costs, and the popular election of judges -- have been emulated virtually nowhere else on earth. It's a fair inference that these ideas have not been found particularly attractive as compared with the many American innovations that have spread widely to other parts of the globe. And the European WSJ today editorially criticizes the case (see Overlawyered, Nov. 17-19, 2000) in which American attorney Ed Fagan (more), apparently undaunted by charges of forum-shopping, is suing in New York over a cable-car tunnel calamity in Austria.

Posted by Walter Olson at 04:25 PM | TrackBack (1)

Comparative Law
Loser Pays



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.