class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« Ohio asbestos-silica law | Let your AG do the walking »

August 20, 2004


Professor Brickman responds

Those who have been following the ongoing Featured Discussion between Lester Brickman and Richard Painter on contingency fee reform, be sure to check out Professor Brickman's response to Professor Painter, entered early yesterday evening.

Posted by James R. Copland at 10:22 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Attorneys' Fees and Ethics









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.