class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

FORUM

« Junk science in asbestos litigation | MedPundit on asbestos »

August 18, 2004


Robert Samuelson on AGs' warming suit

He doesn't think much of it: "Any self-respecting judge will dismiss this suit --and do more. Because the only point is political self-promotion, the judge ought to require the attorneys general to pay court costs and defendants' costs from their own pockets." ("Clearing the Air", Newsweek, Aug. 11 (via Andrew Stuttaford, NRO "The Corner"). For more on the suit, see Jul. 21, Jul. 27, and Aug. 3; CommonsBlog, Jul. 27 and Aug. 14; Mark Clayton, "In hot pursuit of polluters", Christian Science Monitor, Aug. 19).

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:01 AM | TrackBack (1)



categories:
Regulation Through Litigation









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.