PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Featured Discussion underway now! | Robert Samuelson on AGs' warming suit »

August 17, 2004


Junk science in asbestos litigation

Over on Volokh Conspiracy, our friend David Bernstein has a post on junk science in asbestos litigation. Professor Bernstein cites to a study posted on Healthfactsandfears.com in which "plaintiffs' B-readers reported that 95.9% of 492 chest x-rays had possible asbestos-related lung damage, [but] unaffiliated doctors found that only 4.5% of them showed possible damage." Those who've read Professor Brickman's voluminous piece on the subject shouldn't be surprised.

Posted by James R. Copland at 03:02 PM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Asbestos
Products Liability
Scientific Evidence
Statistics/Empirical Work









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.