class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« Is Mel Weiss worried? | New York Post calls for Calabresi's resignation »

June 22, 2004

SCOTUS: antitrust law not readily exportable

Not quite yet lawmakers to the world: to sighs of relief from the business community, the Supreme Court last week ruled 8-0 that federal antitrust law cannot be used to demand triple damages from foreign businesses over sins committed abroad against foreign consumers absent some more substantial domestic involvement in the case. It overturned the D.C Circuit's ruling to the contrary. "Stephen A. Bokat, senior vice president and general counsel of the United States Chamber of Commerce, said the decision was a 'very positive development' in its campaign against what it calls 'global forum shopping.'" (Linda Greenhouse, "The Reach of U.S. Antitrust Law Overseas Is Limited", New York Times, Jun. 15).

Posted by Walter Olson at 10:10 AM | TrackBack (0)

Comparative Law



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.