class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
   
   
 
   

FORUM

« "Asbestos Free Texas" woos GOP | Can Rule 11 be rescued? »

June 21, 2004


Reforming pre- and post-judgment interest

In Massachusetts and Rhode Island, to name two states, interest accumulates on medical malpractice judgments at an astonishing 12 percent per annum, which may have made sense in the days of high inflation but in an era of 6 percent mortgages is pretty much a straight subvention to plaintiffs and their lawyers. A change to more realistic interest rates is, of course, bitterly resisted by the trial lawyers' lobby. ("Mass. May Cut Interest Paid on Med-Mal Awards", Insurance Journal, Jun. 16; more at ATRA (PDF) (via Martin Grace); "Doctors Pushing For Medical Liability Reform", TurnTo10.com (R.I.), Jun. 8.

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:09 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Medicine and Law
Politics









 

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.