class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« Does tort reform affect insurance rates? II | Prisoners escaping jail? Sue the plumber »

May 19, 2004

Update: Ness Motley and James Down

A feature from the Chicago Tribune on the Ness Motley sellout of its clients in the James Blair Down case (see Jul. 7 and follow-ups Aug. 24 and Jan. 17) is revealing about forum-shopping:

[Blair] Hahn told his clients he knew exactly where to find the class-action judgment they needed: in Madison County, across the Mississippi River from St. Louis.

In testimony later, [former Secret Service agent James] McGunn said Hahn assured them he could "manipulate" the court, and that "his wishes would be granted."

"The reason that they selected Madison County was because the judge there looked very kindly on Ness Motley and would be very favorably impressed with whatever they said," McGunn recalled Hahn telling him. "They would have no problem in Madison County."

On February 18, Madison County Judge Phillip Kardis (Oct. 7) held a twenty-minute hearing and preliminarily approved a class action settlement that provided millions for the lawyers and little for the class. (Greg Burns, "The lawsuit capital", Chicago Tribune, Mar. 8).

[cross-posted from Overlawyered, where it ran Mar. 25, 2004]

Posted by Ted Frank at 11:25 PM | TrackBack (0)

Attorneys' Fees and Ethics
Class Actions



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.