PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« The nullification crisis of 2004? | Illinois Supreme Court lowers appeal bond requirement »

June 16, 2004


Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders

The Supreme Court, with near-unanimity (Thomas dissenting), has decided a case involving claims in which sexual harassment law intersects with the law of "constructive discharge" -- that is to say, where complainants weren't fired but say they had to quit because the environment at work was so hostile. George Lenard analyzes the case and discusses press reaction (Jun. 14 and Jun. 15) and Michael Fox also comments (opinions courtesy Findlaw).

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:29 PM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Employment Law









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.