class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« New vs. Old Democrats on Class Actions | Class conflicts: a dose of theory »

May 14, 2004

Countersue? Just try it, doc

When doctors are named in groundless malpractice lawsuits, they often want to fight back by filing countersuits or moving for sanctions. But, as American Medical News is the latest to learn, our legal system is elaborately structured to deny them any such recourse for the injury done them by the lawsuit. (Tanya Albert, "Fighting frivolous lawsuits: Doctors engage in an uphill battle", American Medical News, Oct. 27). For a few of the rare instances in which countersuits or sanctions motions have been successful, see Sept. 6-8, 2002; Jun. 14-15, 2000; Sept. 14, 1999.

[cross-posted from Overlawyered, where it ran Oct. 30, 2003] More: see Jan. 10, 2005 (Pennsylvania Medical Society has begun assisting doctors in countersuits).

Posted by Walter Olson at 11:31 PM | TrackBack (0)

Loser Pays
Medicine and Law



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.